Christie lauds Supreme Court decision on sports betting

USA Today Sports Image

USA Today Sports Image

The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act that passed in 1992 did not ban sports gambling nationwide on the federal level, but rather prohibited states to allow it. Nevada was grandfathered in.

Gaming industry experts have predicted that many states, including California, would authorize betting on sports if given a chance to do so.

"PASPA "regulates state governments" regulation' of their citizens".

Silver said the league would "remain active" in ongoing discussions with state legislatures in the wake of the Supreme Court's ruling.

Get ready for legalized sports betting. As a result of the ruling, individual states will now have control over whether to allow sports gambling. There have also been exceptions for Montana, Oregon and DE, which had already approved some form of sports betting before the 1992 law took effect. The American Gaming Association estimates that Americans illegally wager about $150 billion on sports each year, according to CBS News. Justice Sonia Sotomayor agreed, and Justice Stephen G. Breyer agreed in part with her dissent.

The U.S. appeals court in Philadelphia struck down this measure because it had the obvious impact of legalizing gambling that was forbidden under federal law.

Christie, a Republican, called it a "great day" for the public in a tweet and says he's proud to have fought to give the public the right to bet.

New encryption vulnerability means email is no longer secure
The research paper details multiple approaches for using the vulnerabilities to decrypt S/MIME and OpenPGP encrypted emails. The attacker changes an encrypted email in a particular way and sends this changed encrypted email to the victim.

While programs now exist to educate student-athletes about the dangers of sports betting and attempts to fix games, those will likely have to be beefed up in order to combat heightened awareness and advertising that is sure to follow the approval of single-game betting.

In 2011, New Jersey voters were presented with a sports betting referendum ballot question.

Bradley said there was virtually no congressional opposition to his bill back in 1992, though Bradley added that Donald Trump, with failing investments in Atlantic City casinos at the time, lobbied against it, believing that sports betting was the answer to his financial problems there. Outside court, however, leaders of all but the National Football League have shown varying degrees of openness to legalized sports gambling.

"New Jersey has always been the lead advocate in fighting this inherently unequal law, and today's ruling will finally allow for authorized facilities in New Jersey to take the same bets that are legal in other states in our country", New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy, a Democrat, said in a statement.

New Jersey has spent years and millions of dollars in legal fees trying to legalize sports betting. It argued taking its laws off the books was different from authorizing sports gambling. Professional sports leagues in recent years have begun to shift their views regarding sports betting.

New Jersey has lost several rulings along the way, and the case previously had not been heard by the Supreme Court in 2014.

More than a dozen states had supported New Jersey, which argued that Congress exceeded its authority when it passed its law.

Recommended News

We are pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news.
Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper.
Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.